On Nov 30, 12:58 pm, Mac <mrnap...@optonline.net> wrote:
> Renli wrote:
> > On Nov 30, 11:37 am, Shava_X <voodopeo...@rocketNOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:03:06 -0800, Renli wrote:
>
> >>>http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/2007/11/10/chinese-sub-pop...
>
> >>>-
>
> >>It is almost certain that this was because one or more people screwed up,
> >>not because of some magical technological advance by the Chinese. One or
> >>more people are soon to loose their careers over this, and the U.S. Navy
> >>will re-emphasise the basics of anti-submarine warfare. That will put an
> >>end to surprise visits.
>
> > "The sub was apparently able to slip past at least a dozen U.S.
> > warships, two U.S. submarines and a vast array of advanced technology,
> > which failed to detect it."
>
> no failure
> military's way of asking for more money, nothing more..
>
> > However, it is not projected to - snicker - "put an end to suprise
> > visits" for at least 4 to 6 years. By which time China will have a
> > floating Aircraft Carrier.
>
> > -
>
> do u, actually believe that stuff u write?
>
> M.
Yes.
What does M. stand for?
-
|
|