Tim Merrigan <tppm@ca.rr.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 09:36:03 -0500, Frank McCoy <mccoyf@millcomm.com>
>wrote:
>
>>"F. Brown" <fredbrown@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Haven't seen you lately.
>>
>>Was gone for two weeks.
>>Took that long for the judge to reinstate my bail during the appeal
>>process because of a misunderstanding.
>>
>>Then, when I got out, it took another week for the judge to approve my
>>having the same restrictions I had during the previous long wait.
>>
>>AND ... It took until last night for me to get my main computer back;
>>and until this morning to get my Internet-Connection re-established.
>>
>>So ... I was gone; but now I'm back while the appeals-process goes
>>through.
>>
>>Who knows how long THAT will take?
>>;-{
>
>I suspect longer then it might have, what with the sequester and now
>the shutdown. I suspect your case is fairly low priority and so
>likely to be postponed when the courts and investigators run out of
>money.
I suspect you might be right.
It will probably *continue* though; because both sides figure it's
important enough to keep plugging away at.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 |
|