"F. Brown" <fredbrown@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:520f6aad$0$4307$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
>
> "Frank McCoy" <mccoyf@millcomm.com> wrote in message
> news:96fqv850qadfaemhusjstdak0h5kedpb1t@4ax.com...
>> Justin Thyme <abuse@localhost.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 09:18:55 -0400, "F. Brown" <fredbrown@nowhere.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>I follow the Electronic Frontier Foundation and their battles against
>>>>censorship
>>>>and restrictions on free speech. Many of the appellate rulings they win
>>>>contain the
>>>>phrase, "would have a chilling effect on free speech." Makes me think
>>>>that
>>>>the
>>>>appellate courts understand SCOTUS's position on free speech.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Seems to me that the Bush court has the view that free speach only
>>>applies to corporations.
>>
>> ... And government politicians ... Those belonging to the particular
>> party in-power at the moment, of course.
>
> Which is why the Citizens United decision infuriates them, although they
> incorrectly blame Citizens for lifting the monetary restrictions imposed
> by McCain-Feingold. Speech Now Org sued the FEC and won over those
> restrictions. While Citizens was decided by SCOTUS, Speech Now
> ended at the DC appellate court, the Justice Dept deciding not to appeal.
>
>
Obama was not an incumbant. He outraised McCain and had/had MSM in his
corner. He's done more damage to America than any president since FDR.
>
>> --
>> _____
>> / ' / T
>> ,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
>> (_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 |
|