Justin Thyme <abuse@localhost.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 14:05:18 -0600, Frank McCoy <mccoyf@millcomm.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Even so, many people ASS-U-ME that I'd molest a child if I had the
>>opportunity. Funny though: Since I met my wife, SHE is the only
>>person in the world I've wanted sex with. Even now, though it's been
>>almost three years since we've had sex together, I'm not even tempted
>>to go looking for anybody else. Why look for mediocre, when you've
>>already had first-prize and there's still a chance of getting it
>>again?
>>
>Someone asked Paul Newman about the secret of his long marriage and he
>replied something to the effect "Why go out for a hamburger when you
>can stay home and have steak?" Your metaphor makes more sense since
>one could argue that even with a steady diet of steak one might like
>the occasional burger. I guess the key is that you can't have both.
>Even in Newman's metaphor you likely would be plenty willing to
>forswear hamburgers if they would jeopardize all steak in the future.
>
>As for children, little kids in general and little girls in particular
>are inherently cute. I can even understand finding nude pictures of
>them appealing since they are sort of miniature women. I find much of
>the logic used to justify the current anti-porn crusade kind of
>skewed. That said, I can't see why anyone would want to actually have
>sex with them, especially not in preference to the real thing.
>
The problem is: They're immature ... Not just in body; but
more-importantly in MIND as well. If you're a person who CARES about
your lovers, like I do, that's incredibly important ... important
enough to make you impotent with anybody less than a true partner.
That, of course, is why I fell in love with my wife; and she's STILL
the most important person in my life. Having somebody smart enough to
be worth listening-to, and yet not so smart that she thinks everything
you say is dumb, makes a woman far sexier than a beautiful body ever
would. That she had a body that many models would have envied was
incredibly good icing on the cake.
But it wasn't her body that I fell in love with.
She's now 73; and I STILL get gooey-eyed whenever I look at her.
As for kids as lovers ... My daydreams are more about when I was a kid
and would have given up an arm or a leg to have somebody of the
opposite-sex look at me like I still look at the wife. Being skinny,
poor, ugly, and a geek who was almost always the "new kid in school"
as we moved around a lot, instead I was the kid who the girls avoided
and the bullies found convenient to pick-on and beat up. Rarely if
ever alone though. They always ran in packs of three or four.
Basically cowards who talked big.
>Good luck in your endeavors. I hope you have a positive outcome.
>
Surprisingly, I'm not all that worried about whichever way the verdict
reads. If I win, then it's pretty much over. If I lose, then the
case goes to a higher court where there's a chance of the original
issue of First Amendment Rights being considered. Even if I end up in
prison and die there, I've had a fairly long and wonderful life ...
far better than I ever expected, with 40+ years of marriage when I
originally pleaded for just one. If I lose everything ... Well, I've
lost everything before. Losing the wife to cancer would have been
worse.
I'm looking forward to a wonderful Thanksgiving.
Better than I even hoped for.
--
_____
/ ' / ™
,-/-, __ __. ____ /_
(_/ / (_(_/|_/ / <_/ <_
|
Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
|