[Default] On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:34:07 -0500, Frank McCoy
<mccoyf@millcomm.com> typed:
>Not commenting on my particular case.
>
[...]
>
>The more restrictive and anti-sex the community is, the higher the
>sex-crime-rate; and usually the more violent such crimes are.
>
That is something that has been pointed out in the various support
groups as well to the vociferous denials of the haters.
>That doesn't mean that you cannot find very extreme examples of such
>crimes in the most free of societies. It also doesn't mean (if you're
>looking for such things) that a larger number of people in a larger
>society won't have more sex-crimes. They will, even if the per-capita
>rate is much lower. It also doesn't mean or even suggest that people
>who do commit such crimes avoid exposure to porn.
>
>Common mistakes by those who ass-u-me that the USA having a much
>larger population-base than Saudi Arabia will have a lower *total*
>number of sex-crimes if the per-capita rate is actually lower. The
>fact that SA has less total crimes, is used to suggest that limiting
>availability of sexual materials lowers sex-crime-rates; when in-fact
>the reverse is true.
>
>We have more such crimes, simply because we have FAR more people.
>
Exactly!
Thanks for that essay, Frank. I know you are going to be attacked for
telling the truth but chin up and roll with the punches.
--
David
No email replies please.
Someone is speaking well of you. How unusual!
|
|