x2lls wrote:
> Finally, we have agreement.
We don't have agreement. We have you failing
to recognize that you were being mocked!
> No, the evidence I posted was proof of SC girls being aware of action
> by SC.
You have been told 5 times now that posting a collection
of keyboard characters to a newsgroup is not "proof" of
anything. Anybody can concoct a message supposedly from
someone else and that's what you did because you're a
troll. That's what trolls do.
> Nothing more, nothing less, simples. Even if the stuff posted
> here IS a hoax, it doesn't detract from what is ACTUALLY happening.
Nothing is happening, other than trolls getting busy masquerading
as SC girls and their webmaster.
> probably a good early warning so's posters can avoid. Are you so thick
> so as not to know that? Jeez, you must be so backward, you have
> reversing lights fitted behind your ears!!
What's the point of resorting to insults when you can't get
anyone to swallow your bullshit? It doesn't make that
bullshit any more convincing. We've told you twice about
"ad hominem".
>
> On a more serious note, besides the laugh that all other SC group
> followers, and you two trolls , (Hi DOOM, alright mate?), are having,
> at your delusional argument,
> you have a wonderful way of 'attempting' to avoid the truth. Face it,
> every group that goes tits up, is one less of your kingdom.
> How long now until you realise that when you are up to your arse in
> alligators, it is difficult to remind yourself, that your initial
> task, was to drain the swamp!.
What have you been smoking? Stay at Supernews and send
us some more messages. Make sure they are supposed to be
from SC. Use the same news server, use the same computer,
use the same ISP, use the same trial edition of Forte Agent
and follow it up with the same overkill bullshit. We love
it. Whatever you do, don't try too hard thinking about how
to concoct a convincing message or somebody might believe it.
> Who has been claiming to be king of usenet for at least two decades?
I don't think anyone has been "claiming". The actual King
is, of course, JoeBlob.
> Who has been reposting for at least two decades?
Fishnet Fred. But Joe updates allover30.com, Mature.NL,
and many other sites twice a week and has done so
for at least 15 years.
> I am not looking for followers
That must be a big relief for you. Look at the title
of the group. People come here for SC pictures, so I
think your plan of not looking for followers is a
reasonable one because you won't get them.
> Favor is not a condition I wish for
Another relief. Why would a troll concocting fake SC
messages be looking for favor? Seems like you are
making blinding statements of the obvious.
> >
>
> So, I am NOW an outcast troll?.
Correct
> By that thinking, I have never been a
> troll until now, which means you have been telling porkies all these
> years. And there's me thinking I was in favor of all those others you
> have accused in the past.
You've always been a troll, as long as any of us
can remember - years and years. Further, you have never
been ANYTHING ELSE. If you don't know that you have greater
problems than we first identified.
>
> Now, a traitor is someone who was once a part of a group or nation.
> The said individual, has then gone on to cause damage or injury to
> other members of the group to which they belonged
Not quite. In a traitor's early days he is often STILL
a member of his group. Sometimes the traitor can taint
the group by virtue of the "bad apple" syndrome. That's
what we will definitely prevent as far as you and your
little SC and SC girls "messages" are concerned.
>
> Make up your mind Josephine, either you know, or you don't. If you
> think you told me, I can assist you by informing you that you have
> been telling me over and over and over and over and over again.
Can somebody translate that please?
>
> I'm older than you, and probably know more about life than you will
> ever do.
There you go again. You've posted a few text characters above and
you believe that it's absolutely true. It isn't. If you
knew anything about life you would know that you can't fool
people by concocting hopelessly amateurish threats from SC.
>
> Now I suggest you scuttle off to your gambling site.
See, you've got that wrong too. Better go back and find out
what the site is. The word "gambling" has NEVER been used
in its description. We suggest you scuttle off to get
your facts right.
Bye now!
|
|