On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:52:06 +0100, BeatingAllTrolls <bat@news.com>
wrote:
Is a Supernews troll better than a Newsguy troll?
>Oh yes, of course, of course, of course.
>
>Of course you support the group!
>Of course you support the posters!
>
Finally, we have agreement.
>That's why all you've done is to post
>what you call evidence for, wait for it....
>
>NON-POSTING IN A POSTING GROUP!!
I think you really mean posting text in a picture group.
Not surprising, since you say otherwise, in text, in a pictures
group.. (Did you like that reiteration? Great, wasn't it!! ;) )
No, the evidence I posted was proof of SC girls being aware of action
by SC.Nothing more, nothing less, simples. Even if the stuff posted
here IS a hoax, it doesn't detract from what is ACTUALLY happening.
probably a good early warning so's posters can avoid. Are you so thick
so as not to know that? Jeez, you must be so backward, you have
reversing lights fitted behind your ears!!
On a more serious note, besides the laugh that all other SC group
followers, and you two trolls , (Hi DOOM, alright mate?), are having,
at your delusional argument,
you have a wonderful way of 'attempting' to avoid the truth. Face it,
every group that goes tits up, is one less of your kingdom.
How long now until you realise that when you are up to your arse in
alligators, it is difficult to remind yourself, that your initial
task, was to drain the swamp!.
>
>Nobody else has done that and done it over
>and over and over and over again.
>No, only YOU have done that.
So what is this blather then? pictures from SC?
Hmmm, no attachments.
Who has been claiming to be king of usenet for at least two decades?
Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
again?
Who has been reposting for at least two decades?
Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
again?
>Everyone else wants to see posts being made as usual.
That's very true, we agree again, see above.
>
>So take your bullshit excuses and attempts to
>crawl back into favor and shove them up your ass
>because nobody is going to support you or your
>philosophy ever again.
I am not looking for followers, that is your game, and diminishing
fast. How many now is it? I'd say there would be one per newbie, for
about a week per newbie. Look at the stats that you have access to,
I'm probably overestimating.
Favor is not a condition I wish for, unlike your good self, and you
have yet to acquire, even after two decades.
>
>You are now an outcast troll, an existence
>from which there is no return and no recovery.
So, I am NOW an outcast troll?. By that thinking, I have never been a
troll until now, which means you have been telling porkies all these
years. And there's me thinking I was in favor of all those others you
have accused in the past.
Recover from what? a porn group?
>I suggest you read Aesop's Fables sometime
>then you will know that nobody loves a traitor.
Yet again, we fully agree, see above.
Now, a traitor is someone who was once a part of a group or nation.
The said individual, has then gone on to cause damage or injury to
other members of the group to which they belonged, just like someone
who recently become a troll?
>I think we told you earlier, more than once, to
>learn about people and human nature.
Make up your mind Josephine, either you know, or you don't. If you
think you told me, I can assist you by informing you that you have
been telling me over and over and over and over and over again.
I'm older than you, and probably know more about life than you will
ever do.
Now I suggest you scuttle off to your gambling site.
|
|