| 
| Re: ATTN: Fishnet Fred, Slick, Piper, and other SC Collectors "FreeSetsConatctSheet001.jpg" yEnc 284242 Bytes | Slick |  | Slick (Slick@Slick.com) | 2009/07/19 12:12 |  | 
 | Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!indigo.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!teal.octanews.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:12:06 -0500
 Newsgroups: alt.binaries.southern-charms.pictures
 Subject: Re: ATTN: Fishnet Fred, Slick, Piper, and other SC Collectors "FreeSetsConatctSheet001.jpg" yEnc 284242 Bytes
 From: Slick <Slick@Slick.com>
 References: <rPKdnZALv8fwbP_XnZ2dnUVZ_gv_fwAA@giganews.com> <part1of1.1.$#pMZZlvQkaurQ@ue.ph>
 Organization: Slick
 User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
 Message-ID: <PNqdnZ6xSv9r_P7XnZ2dnUVZ_hpi4p2d@giganews.com>
 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:12:06 -0500
 Lines: 22
 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
 X-Trace: sv3-gfQJUfsDa9nZzeuxBARVArhvStBO9hcDujpl5bAkv6R3GEj03kfNAyzp0JmtcDfypIHGN+i4571ZZi0!VkUdui0F/HqSlGbO3zYaiDasSz/neg6wBrdA0SLU55FjV6d931UD1u6SPUbW7nZc8IXVHtOGua4C!qg==
 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
 X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
 X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
 X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
 X-Original-Bytes: 1938
 Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.southern-charms.pictures:1051
 
 Piper <here@there.com> wrote in news:part1of1.1.$#pMZZlvQkaurQ@ue.ph:
 
 > Magnum <Magnum@onthenet> wrote:
 >>I really did hate to rename the files, but when I was creating the
 >>Master Catalog Index filenames were all over the place
 >>for the 1st 180 sets. I'm a stickler for not changing filenames myself
 >>since it can help to discover duplicates if you just
 >>use windows filecopy, but I made an exception in this case. Also if
 >>you create just a simple file listing everything appears
 >>in numerical order - it simply made things much easier to work with.
 >
 >
 > Magnum,
 >
 > I agree with you 100%. I ALWAYS rename all SC files to the current
 > naming convention!
 >
 > Piper
 >
 
 You're still wrong, the current naming convention would be lo16x***.jpg,
 not lo016x***.jpg lmao! :)
 
 | 
 
 |  |