You two old homos need to get a room...
Old homo #1's issue was composing his subject line for the multiple
postings... without the album title in the subject line there is no way
anyone could even create a folder for the files to download into a correct
folder, so somebody is not only an idiot, but now claims to be an idiot
since the AOL days... with Davy Crocket at the Alamo, no doubt.
On the other hand, your tip to dump them all into one folder then sort them
using the tags' album information was semi-constructive... That is still
going to take more than 3-minutes, as you so dishonestly claimed... but it
requires a leap-of-faith that anyone so lazy and stupid as to post in such
an imbecillic manner was posting files that are properly tagged... such a
let down when they don't do that... and in the present usenet environment,
especially in the MP3 groups, there's a prolific innundation of crap and
trash posts... I've even downloaded apparently decent MP3 albums that end
up as zero-byte blank files with my MP3 default icon... Then there's the
.flac files and rar-in-rar and password protected... etc., etc., a bit
excessive for someone who has a life outside of usenet..
My point, since you old homo know it alls cannot seem to discern humor and
are so tied up in you own omnisient importance syndromes, is that if you
posted with properly constructed subject lines [omitting the number-of-
number confusion element - which serves absolutely NO PURPOSE other than
as an obstacle to downloading in multiple album uploads - would be a start]
Thanks for your bragadocious left-handed tip to download dump then sort by
album title... If I ever see an upload of an artist that I'd like to
explore, I'll try it.
As far as encouraging retarded posters to continue retarding posting, when
so many contributors are doing it exactly correctly, I'll stick with my
admodishment for you two old homos to get a room - since you love each
other so much.
Since you've got your dicks in each other's mouths, I'll let you tell the
other super-sensitive one that a lot of contributors upload and download
under one handle from a secure configuration and post text messages from
another account and configuration... without needing to brag about it or
pretend to be superior.
Take the constructive criticism and move forward, or keep whining about it,
but like I said, you need to get a room, because I don't care about your
tender feelings.
Spidey <Hannah_Qe@hotmail.com> posted:
> [...] Your posting was fine and had some
> really great stuff!
>
> Spidey
>
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:24:13 -0600, SoulFan wrote:
>
>>
>>Spidey, I did post each album seperately, unfortunately what occurred is
>>that I did not change the album number for each set & since they came
>>from the same poster, it just combined them as one, an experienced
>>person such as yourself would be able to understand this, but apparently
>>the person complaining did not know how to differentiate. I also took
>>exception with the name calling by that person ie: (unhappy person) &
>>the fact that they apparently were not a contributor in any way and yet
>>they believed themselves to be all knowing. As I had said to you early
>>on, I had not posted in a while & apololgized for any mistakes, there
>>was a time many years ago when I posted prolifically (under a different
>>name), I have been a newsgroup user from the beginning, from the days
>>when AOL gave us all access to them for free with a subscription to
>>their online services. I guess I should just go back to lurking & leave
>>it to the professionals. In any event I thank you once more for your
>>responses to my requests as well as all that you do for others & for the
>>enlightenment on this issue. I don't apologize to others who contribute
>>nothing, yet they are overly critical about a post rather than offering
>>hints to correct it. SF
>>> I merely downloaded everything into one folder displaying the album
>>> name from the tags, sorted on that column, and dragged each album's
>>> tracks off into it's own folder.
[...]
>>> >Spidey <Hannah_Qe@hotmail.com> posted :
>>> >
>>> >> "how much research and work it would be" - it literally took me 3
>>> >> minutes
>>>
>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|