No worries. There will always be perpetually unhappy people who want
you to be unhappy as well (It's true that misery loves company).
Please don't get discouraged. Your posting was fine and had some
really great stuff!
Spidey
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:24:13 -0600, SoulFan wrote:
>
>Spidey, I did post each album seperately, unfortunately what occurred is that I did not change
>the album number for each set & since they came from the same poster, it just combined them as
>one, an experienced person such as yourself would be able to understand this, but apparently
>the person complaining did not know how to differentiate. I also took exception with the name
>calling by that person ie: (unhappy person) & the fact that they apparently were not a contributor
>in any way and yet they believed themselves to be all knowing. As I had said to you early on, I
>had not posted in a while & apololgized for any mistakes, there was a time many years ago
>when I posted prolifically (under a different name), I have been a newsgroup user from the
>beginning, from the days when AOL gave us all access to them for free with a subscription to
>their online services. I guess I should just go back to lurking & leave it to the professionals. In
>any event I thank you once more for your responses to my requests as well as all that you do
>for others & for the enlightenment on this issue. I don't apologize to others who contribute
>nothing, yet they are overly critical about a post rather than offering hints to correct it.
>SF
>
>>
>> Perhaps you misunderstood:
>>
>> The complaint was that because the posts ere not properly organized
>> into albums, and you therefore have multiple track 1s, track 2s, etc.,
>> that it would take a long time to sort everything out.
>>
>> I merely downloaded everything into one folder displaying the album
>> name from the tags, sorted on that column, and dragged each album's
>> tracks off into it's own folder.
>>
>> Easy peasy, as they say.
>>
>> I do in fact have a very, very fast Internet connection as well, but
>> that's not what the discussion was about.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:57:38 GMT, "Alexander Shofner-Geidt"
>> <alex-SG_1990@privacy.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Wow! You must have a really fast computer!
>> >
>> >Spidey <Hannah_Qe@hotmail.com> posted :
>> >
>> >> "how much research and work it would be" - it literally took me 3
>> >> minutes
>>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|