Spidey, I did post each album seperately, unfortunately what occurred is that I did not change
the album number for each set & since they came from the same poster, it just combined them as
one, an experienced person such as yourself would be able to understand this, but apparently
the person complaining did not know how to differentiate. I also took exception with the name
calling by that person ie: (unhappy person) & the fact that they apparently were not a contributor
in any way and yet they believed themselves to be all knowing. As I had said to you early on, I
had not posted in a while & apololgized for any mistakes, there was a time many years ago
when I posted prolifically (under a different name), I have been a newsgroup user from the
beginning, from the days when AOL gave us all access to them for free with a subscription to
their online services. I guess I should just go back to lurking & leave it to the professionals. In
any event I thank you once more for your responses to my requests as well as all that you do
for others & for the enlightenment on this issue. I don't apologize to others who contribute
nothing, yet they are overly critical about a post rather than offering hints to correct it.
SF
>
> Perhaps you misunderstood:
>
> The complaint was that because the posts ere not properly organized
> into albums, and you therefore have multiple track 1s, track 2s, etc.,
> that it would take a long time to sort everything out.
>
> I merely downloaded everything into one folder displaying the album
> name from the tags, sorted on that column, and dragged each album's
> tracks off into it's own folder.
>
> Easy peasy, as they say.
>
> I do in fact have a very, very fast Internet connection as well, but
> that's not what the discussion was about.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:57:38 GMT, "Alexander Shofner-Geidt"
> <alex-SG_1990@privacy.com> wrote:
>
> >Wow! You must have a really fast computer!
> >
> >Spidey <Hannah_Qe@hotmail.com> posted :
> >
> >> "how much research and work it would be" - it literally took me 3
> >> minutes
>
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|