On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:27:17 -0800, Sawbuck <2fins4@a.sawbuck> wrote:
>
>from the .nfo
>
>Source...............: NMR
>Codec................: Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC)
>Quality..............: Lossless, (avg. compression: 48 %)
>Information..........: quality is what you would expect from
>320 kbps
>
>telanom, I do realize this isn't your rip, but are you able
>to shed some light on the discrepancy between Codec/Quality
>& the apparent reference to mp3 indicated in Information.
>
>Much appreciated.
Of course - I'm afraid that I had forgotten that I had made that
confusing reference in the nfo as I've had that album for a while..
Sadly, many albums from that time had less than steller production
values. So, although this album was clearly ripped the spectrograph
shows the quality as being around 320kbps. It is however as good as
you're going to find for this album.
It has happened several times that I have ripped an album myself only
to find the quality very disappointing. I bought a bunch of
"remastered" Woody Guthrie CDs and every one of them was like that. It
happens...
Frankly, I might not have uploaded this had I noticed. I only viewed
the audiochecker...
Tel.
|
|