I'd just like to point out that DSD sample rates are based on
multiples of 44.1 kHz, so DSD64 is equivalent to PCM sampled at 88.2
kHz, DSD128 176.4 kHz, etc.
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 21:38:01 -0500, SuperAudioLabs <Super@udio.labs>
wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 22:43:00 +0000, d(-_-)b Who?? wrote:
>
>> In reply to "SuperAudioLabs" who wrote the following:
>>
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:21:36 +0000, d(-_-)b Who?? wrote:
>>>
>>> > 24 Bit 44.1 KHz is m'eh - At least 96khz!
>>>
>>> And I prefer 1-bit 2.822Mhz, but we take what we can get.
>>
>> I'd like to try DSD 5.6MHz!
>
>5.6 is old hat; we're up to DSD512 now, which is 11.2MHz.
>
>But you don't actually get a lot of audible advantage with that high of a
>rate. All it's really good for is giving you more range for ultrasonic
>noise-shaping. 2.8mhz is really only good out to about 45khz, after that
>you start running in to issues with noise-shaping overpowering anything
>you want...and a lot of that depends on how it was converted down or if
>your ADC is actually running at the playback rate.
>
>In reality, it's not...it's usually running much higher...so there's some
>conversion going on somewhere.
>
>5.6MHz gets us to almost what we'd consider full range for 192khz; 11.2MHz
>gets us over that.
>
>The downside is you reach the point where this starts taking up a LOT of
>space. 2.8MHz DSD has a smaller bitrate than 24/192; but 5.6mhz DSD
>doesn't. And 11.2MhZ is actually 22.4mbps audio rate.
>
>I do need to figure out why none of the stuff I'm posting isn't going
>through. I think I may need to RAR the stuff first.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|