In article <161020101058289863%HP@snotmail.com>,
High Priest <HP@snotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <Xns9E11B238BCE64chickenchoker@74.209.131.13>, Chicken
> Choker <chickenchoker@chickenshack.com> wrote:
>
> > Chance Dalhart <lone@dry.gulch> wrote in
> > news:6smcb6p2c7r4ear6h82d08qd16ci47pgat@4ax.com:
> >
> > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:14:13 +0000, Chicken Choker
> > > <chickenchoker@home.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >>Do you guys know what happened to "alt.binaries.pictures.candid.girls"?
> > >
> > > It just turned into a cesspool of Spam, like so many others before.
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. Do you know where everybody went? Did they move to
> > another group? Or did they just give up?
>
>
>
> My guess: Lack of worthwhile content is slowly destroying the whole of
> usenet, not just any person's particular favorite newsgroup.
>
> For example, I was always amazed at the strength and ubiquity of the
> admiration of Sandra. There were always, apparently, huge numbers who
> did worship her. Still do, in fact, even though she's married now. I
> was never much impressed personally, but I put it down to "viva la
> difference". For me, she was never as cute or bold or desirable (let me
> call it the "CBD factor") as Kate or Inna or [your favorite honey
> here].
>
> Then of course there was the flood of LS/BDC material. Beautiful
> models, high technical quality, strong CBD factor, huge quantity. But,
> as with most good things, did not last forever. But, in the meantime,
> it might've raised expectations. Seen it once, want more and, when
> there is no more, disappointment, disillusionment and boredom set in.
>
> These days, mostly just endless spam. Boring, crappy adult bullshit
> porn mostly of very low quality. Some, deliberately shit, designed to
> flood and ruin. Any material designed to appeal to us that does get
> posted, is mostly reruns from years ago. I have not seen any obviously
> new material with a CBD factor, for a long time.
>
> Why? Don't know. There are still zillions of girls willing to pose.
> Maybe the photographers and webmasters have grown cold feet but I don't
> know why that should be so. Even during the last few years when nudity
> has become rare, they were still pumping out material that is obviously
> illegal under US law. (Did they never learn the fact that nudity is not
> a necessary ingredient to make a photo illegal, whereas many clothed
> shots are illegal?)
>
> Final possibility, and the most-likely, are the credit card companies.
> and early two thousands. Hundreds of web sites were offering soft-core
> LS and BDC stuff in the tens or even hundreds of thousands. As the card
> companies caught on to what was happening, they, I suppose, put on
> hoards of new staff whose sole job was to fuck those sites and
> card-processing contracts. I was personally-affected, myself.
>
> They were very successful in that and today, even the sites offering
> only non-nude material (even the non-nude strictly legal sites) are
> closed soon after opening. That is a very strong disincentive to
> photographers and webmasters who might be considering their next move.
>
> There are solutions to the tyranny of the card companies but here is
> not the place to discuss it. Pity.
>
> What can be discussed in usenet is the attitude of the photographers
> and webmasters. I would be very interested to read a simple
> acknowledgement of status. I would like to learn who among the readers
> here, are webmasters and photographers. People willing to provide
> content if only there were a solution to the problem of getting money
> into their pockets.
>
> I would, for example, like someone more-qualified than I, to recommend
> an existing newsgroup that is currently empty, to be used for the
> purpose of discussion only (no pictures) of the problems faced by and
> the professional lives currently being led by photographers and
> webmasters. Is anyone motivated enough to step forward and make a
> suggestion? Nothing illegal in the plan or the proposed correspondence
> so someone should be interested.
>
> What might come out of increased communication could be a solution to
> the current payment-processing constipation. Then we all benefit.
> Models, photographers, webmasters, collectors.
>
>
> (I want to capture as big an audience as possible with this message so
> I'll post in several groups, but individually, so as not to offend
> against the golden rule "no cross-posting". Please forgive me if you
> see it more than once.)
Where things are always discussed, or disgusting. THE PUb. This has
been used recently by a few of the older farts to discuss their
prostrate problems.
I'll give you the password to the place and the address, "fastman sent
me", and the address is "alt.pub".
{ask DayTek if it's okay}
--
JQP Himself, the wiseass dumbass.
I was here when Tat was a pre-teen!
Long live Liaka, SWMBA.
I support law and order, as long as they leave me alone.
Tat just invented dirt.
See You At The PUb, I'll buy the first round.
You Buy the rest, Thanks for all the Advice, or vices.
|
|