On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:30:12 -0500, lucan wrote
(in article <0001HW.D10544B40015ADB7B01029BF@news.giganews.com>):
> (in article <XnsA4416298DECA0roakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
>
>> Two scans attached: "hs-cindy101" and "hs-cindy101+duplicated file name+".
>>
>> The csv I have has the first, it does not have the second under any file
>> name. I suppose it could be handled similarly to how the extra "greta"
>> files were handled - include it with the amended name "hs-cindy1011".
>>
>>
>
> The Cindy Stewart pic was posted this way:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> From: zelig@who.com ( Zelig )
> Subject: Humbert Archive ___ Vintage Fling ( see note ) -
> hs-cindy101.jpg(1/1) 186844 bytes
> Organization: ?
> Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pinups
> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:57:48 -0500
>
>
> These were done as a set. It appears I have moved a few
> around to individual folders by model names.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Index posted by Humbert at that time attached.
>
> lucan
>
I see now that "hs-cindy101.jpg" appears twice in the csv. The second one
(186844 bytes) is sort of hiding in amongst the indices near the end:
hs-cindy101.jpg,186844,eebfdf95,\Humbert Indecies\,Unknown
lucan
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pinups/707', 'Re: <lucan> Humbert scans 2 - 2 attachments - "!!!!!index file001.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [113920 bytes]')){kind=link}