lucan <earl@missing.invalid> wrote in
news:0001HW.D0F3C2390047AF1CB03959BF@news.giganews.com:
> (in article <XnsA434607135C5Eroakerblackcompany@216.166.97.131>):
>
>> I knew there was something else about this girl, and it bugged me
>> until I looked it up. I found that note "see Ann West".
>>
>> Re the attached - a Snowman scan that I am pretty sure has been
>> altered. I have no idea if the name was there for the original scan
>> or was something added in the altering.
>>
>> Whatever. One more name to throw in the pile.
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for the posts.
>
> Searching for 'annwst', I find I have annwst01, 02, 03 as part of a
> Snowman repost by Humbert, so I guess they are most likely originals.
> The annwst01 I have is identical to yours. I'll post 02 and 03 in case
> anyone might want them.
>
> I noticed whilst looking briefly at the two 'Janet Ormes' VEF pages
> that a poster mentioned the Ann West name -- see attached pic.
> Unfortunately, the link to the pic referencing 'Ann West' is dead. The
> name of the now missing pic was 'Ann.Imelda.Janice.jpg'.
>
> lucan
>
>
The reason I assumed the scan wasn't original is the tinting. Other than
the annwst01 and annwst02 scans (especially 02 with the reddish fringe),
I don't recall seeing any Snowman scans that had been "manipulated" like
that. His stuff was always straight forward, as-is, if you know mwhat I
mean.
|
|