I got this from one of those rare contributors who respectfully
remains anonymous.
Thanks to various limitations, I'll probably have to break it up into
at least two parts and perhaps more.
This is just to say that I've read it through and come to the
conclusion that it just might be what it perports to be. I don't know
how much of the 'story' is reality, but I believe the initial author
is legitimate. She may well have made up the memories from whole
cloth, but if so, she has one hell of an imagination.
In any case, I wonder how well it fits into the cultural reality as
opposed to the mis-information of the moral establishment. In any
case, it should provide a few hours of provocative reading and is
certainly within the bounds of social redeamability as defined by the
US Supreme Court . . .
|
|