Path: news.nzbot.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.142.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!novia!sequencer.newscene.com!not-for-mail
From: Paddy McCarthy <erin@shore.oi>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Subject: Re: Anybody have the Non-Kleenex version of Bonus 3?
Date: 19 Nov 2010 22:54:01 -0600
Organization: Newscene Usenet News Service, http://www.newscene.com/
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <apkee6p513injed97c7vipif98dfpngr6u@4ax.com>
References: <g7b9e6l4d4atleor08mt515miutmirhkvh@4ax.com> <4ce4bb9f$0$30096$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> <la4ce6p65m279b2qr44j912joh4i34h8ff@4ax.com> <4ce64c85$0$2131$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb:1553
On 19 Nov 2010 10:08:05 GMT, jorj <jorj@jorj.orr> wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:01 -0600, Paddy McCarthy wrote:
>
>> On 18 Nov 2010 05:37:35 GMT, jorj <jorj@jorj.orr> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 22:37:02 -0600, Paddy McCarthy wrote:
>>>
>>>Why would you want it?
>>>
>>>My Stars posted a few pics from it, but I've never seen a complete set.
>>>So far as I know I was the only one who ever posted it (I'm the one who
>>>posted all those kleenx sets).
>>
>> I prefer the orignal filenames. Even with the screwed up crc, you can
>> use a csv to check for collection completeness.
>
>That's the point: you can't. Because most of the people posting back then
>were using stuff like quadsucker, which just hit links on web pages. And
>webe kept lots of images hidden by including them in the website but no
>links to them. At the time, so far as I have been able to tell, I was
>the only one actually posting bunny, karen, whitney and bobbie. I'm sure
>others shared their pics, but not on usenet in any popular public groups
>of the time.
>
>You can consider the kleenx versions as a complete set unto themselves.
>Furthermore, it's much easier to check for gaps since they're in sequence
>beginning at 1 - the highest number file tells you implicitly how many
>are in the set.
>
>I also posted csvs with these sets at the time of posting which
>crosslinked kleenx names to those cryptic and useless camera generated
>names, but of course the only people who would have saved those also seem
>to be the people who didn't and then complain about altered filenames.
>You were around back then - did you also lose them or did you never pop
>by russian to grab them?
I didn't get them from russian, and have never seen any csvs of any
crosslinked kleenex sets.
|
|