alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintagePrev. Next
Re: J16 - 14 pics virginmedia.com
fredhogan (fredhogan@nothere.com) 2016/04/15 17:09

Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: "fredhogan" <fredhogan@nothere.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage
References: <0X2Qy.238771$kw.84652@fx34.am4> <4am2hbhnph3v0q4pu9re8pecgcg3g7qavn@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <4am2hbhnph3v0q4pu9re8pecgcg3g7qavn@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: J16 - 14 pics
Lines: 2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 format=flowed;
 charset="iso-8859-1";
 reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
Message-ID: <DweQy.1627952$gz.103495@fx40.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.27.240.17
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1460761763 86.27.240.17 (Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:09:23 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:09:23 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 00:09:11 +0100
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4153561359
X-Received-Bytes: 1681
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage:9807

Rodney Reason wrote : Any chance you have a set ID for the attached images?

RR - many thanks - your pictures were indeed a spot-on match for those J16
pictures and - as far as i can see at the moment - were entirely new to me.

so - no - i'm sorry to say that i don't have a set ID for them.

the one thing i did recognise was that familiar dress that we know came
straight from the burtman dressing-up box - and had also been worn by bettie
page and no end of others.

but - as 'J16' is such a very un-burtman-like ID - that connection didn't
seem to take me anywhere.

fredhogan



Follow-ups:1234
Next Prev. Article List         Favorite