retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in news:560CCBD6.5040208
@yahoo.com:
> As I often point out, some of these didn't have very good originals & so
> aren't high quality results but may still be of interest.
>
> --rwl
>
>
I've always maintained nothing makes for better results than good
originals. (Plus it makes it a lot easier.)
|
|