> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:50:40 -0500, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, 26 May 2019 16:20:48 -0500, retrowavelength
>>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Back in October 2018, pic 007.jpg (attached) was posted by Dukie but
>>>>though I knew some of the faces were familiar, I didn't make any
>>>>connections at the time. Here's what I have been able to ID so far.
>>>>
>>>>007.jpg appears to be part of set 46-07. Also attached is
>>>>gstk8064.jpg with appears part of 46-07.
>>>>
>>>>Leftmost girl of 007.jpg appears solo in 46-00.
>>>>Second girl of 007.jpg appears solo 46-08.
>>>>Third girl (the brunette) appears solo in 46-03 and has been tagged
>>>> Rita Sand by at least one photo vendor.
>>>>Far right girl of 007.jpg appears solo in 46-05.
>>>>
>>>>Summarizing:
>>>>46-00 solo
>>>>46-01 I have nothing on that set, anyone have some???
>>>>46-02 A completely different pair of models, unless there's more
>>>> than one 46-02 set. Anyone have a 46-02 with some of the
>>>> 007.jpg girls???
>>>>46-03 solo
>>>>46-04 2 girls, 46-03 & 46-05
>>>>46-05 solo
>>>>46-06 I have nothing on that set, anyone have some???
>>>>46-07 4 girls of 007.jpg
>>>>46-08 solo
>>>>46-09 2 girls, 46-00 & 46-08
>>>>46-10 I have nothing, might be related to 007.jpg
>>>>
>>>>After this, there appear no sets related to 007.jpg.
>>>>46-11 Dolores Du Vaughn set
>>>>46-12 ??
>>>>46-13 Gloria Marlowe set
>>>>46-14 ??
>>>>46-15 Jo-anne Delucia set
>>>>
>>>>--rwl
>>>
>>> 46-20 is the same model as 46-08
>>> 46-23 duo with Lisa Webster and Alexis
>>> 46-24 through 46-33 are all outside shots
>>> 46-37 solo model
>>> 46-40 through 46-45 duo
>>> 46-46 solo
>>> 46-49 duo
>>> 46-51 46-53 solo
>>> 46-54 duo
>>> 46-55 through 46-57 solo
>>> And then we are back outside for a spell.
>>>
>>
>>> 46-20 is the same model as 46-08
>>Are we looking at the same 46-20? The ones I have (attached) don't
>>seem to be the same model.
>>
>>46-39 might be 46-37 with another girl, but I only have this one
>>sample.
>>
>>Could you post some 46-40 thru 46-45? My 46-41 (sample attached) is a
>>single vs duo. And I've only one 46-45, nothing from 46-40 or -42 thru
>>-44.
>>
>>> 46-49 duo
>>The brunette in 46-49 is solo in 46-50 (attached) & the blonde is solo
>>in 46-51.
>>
>>> 46-54 duo
>>The brunette in 46-54 is the solo in 54-53.
>>
>>46-58 is a solo, one of the beach pines shoots.
>>46-59 is a new solo
>>46-60 is 3 girls in one of the beach pines shoots.
>>46-61 is a duo with Dolores Du Vaughn & another model.
>>46-64 is a solo in a beach pines shoot.
>>----
>>46-66 is 4 girls in another beach pines shoot.
>>46-78 is 2 girls in a beach pines shoot. One is much taller than the
>>other. 46-80 is a beach pines duo with the tall one from 46-78 & a
>>brunette. 46-81 is a beach pines duo with the tall one from 46-78 & a
>>blonde who is
>> also in a solo beach pines set 5J.
>>46-82 is 2 girls & beach shoot. One is the short girl from 46-78. The
>> blonde is the 5J girl.
>>46-85 is 3 girls & beach pines shoot. One is the second girl in 46-80
>> (not the tall one from 46-78). One is the short girl from 46-78.
>> The blonde one is the series 5J girl.
>>
>>--rwl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I may have been wrong on the 46-08 / 46-20 link. Here is one of the
> images from that 46-20 set. I have a total of four for 46-20. I
> think the 46-20 model also appeared in F 018 of which I have three.
Here's all the 46-20 that I have. A few duplicates.
--rwl
|
|