On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:50:40 -0500, retrowavelength
<retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 May 2019 16:20:48 -0500, retrowavelength
>> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Back in October 2018, pic 007.jpg (attached) was posted by Dukie but
>>>though I knew some of the faces were familiar, I didn't make any
>>>connections at the time. Here's what I have been able to ID so far.
>>>
>>>007.jpg appears to be part of set 46-07. Also attached is gstk8064.jpg
>>>with appears part of 46-07.
>>>
>>>Leftmost girl of 007.jpg appears solo in 46-00.
>>>Second girl of 007.jpg appears solo 46-08.
>>>Third girl (the brunette) appears solo in 46-03 and has been tagged
>>> Rita Sand by at least one photo vendor.
>>>Far right girl of 007.jpg appears solo in 46-05.
>>>
>>>Summarizing:
>>>46-00 solo
>>>46-01 I have nothing on that set, anyone have some???
>>>46-02 A completely different pair of models, unless there's more
>>> than one 46-02 set. Anyone have a 46-02 with some of the
>>> 007.jpg girls???
>>>46-03 solo
>>>46-04 2 girls, 46-03 & 46-05
>>>46-05 solo
>>>46-06 I have nothing on that set, anyone have some???
>>>46-07 4 girls of 007.jpg
>>>46-08 solo
>>>46-09 2 girls, 46-00 & 46-08
>>>46-10 I have nothing, might be related to 007.jpg
>>>
>>>After this, there appear no sets related to 007.jpg.
>>>46-11 Dolores Du Vaughn set
>>>46-12 ??
>>>46-13 Gloria Marlowe set
>>>46-14 ??
>>>46-15 Jo-anne Delucia set
>>>
>>>--rwl
>>
>> 46-20 is the same model as 46-08
>> 46-23 duo with Lisa Webster and Alexis
>> 46-24 through 46-33 are all outside shots
>> 46-37 solo model
>> 46-40 through 46-45 duo
>> 46-46 solo
>> 46-49 duo
>> 46-51 46-53 solo
>> 46-54 duo
>> 46-55 through 46-57 solo
>> And then we are back outside for a spell.
>>
>
>> 46-20 is the same model as 46-08
>Are we looking at the same 46-20? The ones I have (attached) don't seem to
>be the same model.
>
>46-39 might be 46-37 with another girl, but I only have this one sample.
>
>Could you post some 46-40 thru 46-45? My 46-41 (sample attached) is a
>single vs duo. And I've only one 46-45, nothing from 46-40 or -42 thru -44.
>
>> 46-49 duo
>The brunette in 46-49 is solo in 46-50 (attached) & the blonde is solo in
>46-51.
>
>> 46-54 duo
>The brunette in 46-54 is the solo in 54-53.
>
>46-58 is a solo, one of the beach pines shoots.
>46-59 is a new solo
>46-60 is 3 girls in one of the beach pines shoots.
>46-61 is a duo with Dolores Du Vaughn & another model.
>46-64 is a solo in a beach pines shoot.
>----
>46-66 is 4 girls in another beach pines shoot.
>46-78 is 2 girls in a beach pines shoot. One is much taller than the other.
>46-80 is a beach pines duo with the tall one from 46-78 & a brunette.
>46-81 is a beach pines duo with the tall one from 46-78 & a blonde who is
> also in a solo beach pines set 5J.
>46-82 is 2 girls & beach shoot. One is the short girl from 46-78. The
> blonde is the 5J girl.
>46-85 is 3 girls & beach pines shoot. One is the second girl in 46-80
> (not the tall one from 46-78). One is the short girl from 46-78.
> The blonde one is the series 5J girl.
>
>--rwl
>
>
>
>
>
I may have been wrong on the 46-08 / 46-20 link. Here is one of the
images from that 46-20 set. I have a total of four for 46-20. I
think the 46-20 model also appeared in F 018 of which I have three.
|
|