Rodney Reason <ogri.rules.ok@gmail.com> wrote in
news:sr1c3c92sodfccccgus3qe9m2bsba5s58p@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:27:46 -0600, retrowavelength
> <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Also, Ruth Egnor was aka Dagmar, and I can't see Dagmar in any of
>>> the 68C pictures. Dagmar had a slight chin dimple and this girl
>>> is well rounded. All over!
>>
>>Dagmar the TV star? There was also Dagmar Blair the showgirl. TV's
>>Dagmar was a big girl & 68c doesn't look like a big girl. I think I
>>might see Dagmar Blair's nose in the set but this is a more candid
>>view than most of my Blair pics, so harder to make judgement for me.
>>Could be it's yet another Dagmar??
>
> I was the one who brought 'Dagmar' into it today, so no, I don't
> think so.
>
> The real name of Dagmar the TV star was Virginia Ruth Egnor if
> you can believe the WWW. And the names of your files from the
> myarchives site seems to indicate they got the info from this
> newsgroup. Circular reasoning.
>
> It's hard to believe two Dagmars from that period, but that is
> apparently irrefutable. I wonder if they ever mud-wrestled for
> the name. But two 'Ruth Egnor'? Maybe if it had been Johnson
> or Smith!
>
> RR
Circular reasoning indeed.
I realized a couple of years back that I had misspelled Brenda Denault's
name in a posting (by leaving out the "l"). Then I began to see Denaut
in use and for a second I wondered if my spelling error had started it.
(FWIW, rwl assured me I hadn't - whew!).
|
|