retrowavelength <retrowavelength@yahoo.com> wrote in news:534E1A68.3090909
@yahoo.com:
> >
> (Frankly, I often skip multi-part posts entirely
> because of the extra steps involved in reading/answering them.
> Apparently, I'm really lazy.)
> >
>
> I can sympathize. I've sometimes skipped multipart yencs too. I have two
> newsreaders, both technically obsolete but comfortable to me. One does
> multipart easily but not so yenc. The other does yenc easily but not so
> easily multiparts. I do try not to skip much, though, especially if its
> a post that looks interesting or has names to guess.
>
> --rwl
>
I could have written that. I use what I'm sure is obsolete but I'm used
to. And I often skip multi-part posts unless the whole post proves
interesting - then I go back and check them all out.
|
|