>If there weren't already twelve of them in these indexes,
>I would have said it /was/ NC77.
>
>RR
That's excellent, RR! Perhaps there were more pictures from the shoot
than made it into the marketed set NC77 but somehow made it into another
set number or were sold & used by another publisher for a completely
different product.
--rwl
|
|
.jpg 1/2')){kind=link}