On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:01:55 +0000, Moxy@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 22:39:50 -0500, SL <SerpentLord@Evil.Incarn8>
>wrote:
>
>>On 25 Oct 2018 10:07:50 GMT, Buck@Scanners.Inc (Buck) wrote:
>>
>> She has a pretty face, but #51 reveals what they forgot to
>>photoshop out. Deal killer.
>
>That's a sharp eye, never noticed that. If they photoshop, they
>should do it in a consistent way. Otherwise I have no problems with
>moles/skin blemishes, etc. It's distastful tattoos that kill it for
>me.
I'm glad YOU brought that up...what is the fuckin' deal with
everyone having to have something written on them now! Take a clue:
just tote around the friggin' book if that makes you feel better.
I was watchin' the NFL the other day and all the players have
the full-sleeve tattoos. Stupid. My point: Really! That's how you
want to express yourself today? What are you going to do tomorrow?
You know I can tolerate it on the guys(it's their bodies), but when
you see girls doing it? I don't like that. It seems more of a
masculine thing to do. There might be some cool idea out there for
that, but I haven't seen it.
"SL you friggin' hipocrite! How many Suicide Girls have you
posted?!"
#1 - I don't want to be your filter.
#2 - I do like some of the SG Girls, very much so. ===But
that's the thing for the SG girls: models with over-the-top tattooing
up the wazoo! If they have the angelic faces and breasts/bodies to go
with it - hey, a stiff prick has no consciensce. ;-)
Can you tell I'm in a rant mood, Moxy? :-)
|
|
')){kind=link}