Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Moxy@127.0.0.1
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: SpunkyAngels.com [non nude - advise if i should cease and desist, I have a bucket load of them]
Message-ID: <ch92dd9ds8bsd5s2qaapukedq67v8si1ro@4ax.com>
References: <Xr7AC.1232551$lm7.191746@fx12.am4> <130420181434264506%r@ndy.wang>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:54:14 +0100
X-Received-Bytes: 1609
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1352664648
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:7509
On Fri, 13 Apr 2018 14:34:26 -0500, Randy Wang <r@ndy.wang> wrote:
>In article <Xr7AC.1232551$lm7.191746@fx12.am4>, Moxy <moxy@127.0.0.1>
>wrote:
>
>> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=170755 name=Amy_Bathing Suit-0001.jpg
>
>Here's one data point for you, from a fan: I'm not crazy about chicks
>in swimwear, but chicks in sexy lingerie are a different story. :-}
>Any "non-nude but including lingerie" sets, if there are any such in
>that collection, have my interest and my +1 vote. Thanks!
Thank you for your feedback. :-)
Good points.
There is a real mix in the collection, but I've not got the patience
to sort it out.
Being ruthless. Upload or dump!
|
|