Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
From: Moxy@127.0.0.1
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller
Subject: Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"
Message-ID: <85gbadpm7mnevgmlpuebf91ud6900bp3or@4ax.com>
References: <F5apC.119174$By.48123@fx01.am4> <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com> <110320181119446969%r@ndy.wang>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Forte - www.forteinc.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 23:53:24 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1941
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2631904722
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller:7115
On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:19:44 -0500, Randy Wang <r@ndy.wang> wrote:
>In article <qgbaadhgcih5cb2ft1pp1mp4o56cbdmaj7@4ax.com>,
><Moxy@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what to make of these. I have a collection of 380 sets,
>> 7.5GB in total. Was about to sent them to the bit bucket, but decided
>> to create these samples and put the question out there.
>
>The name rings a sort of generic or general alarm bell here ... I'm not
>familiar with that stuff, but wasn't PV one of the imprints, or
>sub-studio names, of one of those Russian kiddy-pr0n outfits that got
>busted years ago? But maybe I'm wrong and all of those models in the
>PV sets are strictly over 18. Don't know (and I confess that I haven't
>bothered to look at all of the indexes that you posted, only some of
>'em). Unless you're positive that they're all 18+, I wouldn't post.
This was my worry, I haven't even looked through them all, I'll toast
the lot.
I appreciate the feedback. Thank you.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.pictures.earlmiller/7115h', 'Re: pretty-virgins.com _contactsheets [01/30] "PrettyVirgins-0001-index_001.jpg"')){kind=link}