"Savageduck" <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
news:2015031223383774933-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2015-03-13 06:33:15 +0000, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
> said:
>>
>> On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:
>>> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
>>> news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>>>> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
>>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said:
>>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>>>>> "Ri�ardo" <here@glorious-somerset.uk> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:aoWdnc5YZdYcfmfJnZ2dnUU7-dsAAAAA@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Ricardo.
>
> Thankfully,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other
>>>>>>>> countries
>>>>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
>>>>>>>> Many
>>>>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
>>>>>>>> aircraft
>>>>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what
>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>>>>> injunction.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>>>>> here is attempt #3.
>>>>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>>>>> final try.
>>>> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
>>>> ...and here is that final try:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
>>> exposures, or from a single exposure?
>>
>> That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
>> opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
>> You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:
>>
>> <image>
>
> Oh! No! Not again!
> Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad
> light.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Savageduck
Thanks for that.
It looks pretty gloomy. You must have very steady hands (or a tripod) to
have used shutter speeds low enough to get the brighter exposures.
Cheers,
Indrek Aavisto
--
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence clamorous to be led to safety), by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
– H.L. Mencken
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|
')){kind=link}