This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
----------------7737534831725991978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:
> "Savageduck" <savageduck1@(REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
> news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
>> On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> said:
>>> On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>> On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
>>>>> On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
>>>>>> "Ri�ardo" <here@glorious-somerset.uk> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:aoWdnc5YZdYcfmfJnZ2dnUU7-dsAAAAA@giganews.com...
>>>>>>> On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take care:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/03/dubai-british-plane-spotters-arrested-uae-national-security-claims
>>>>>>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ricardo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
>>>>>> problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
>>>>>> have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
>>>>>> plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
>>>>>> years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
>>>>>> forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
>>>>>> in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
>>>>>> significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
>>>>>> injunction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
>>>>> closely at AMS.
>>>>
>>>> Oops! Lets try that again.
>>>
>>> I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
>>> here is attempt #3.
>>> If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
>>> final try.
>> Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
>> ...and here is that final try:
>
>>>
>
> That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
> exposures, or from a single exposure?
That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:

----------------7737534831725991978
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="(null)"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="(null)"
----------------7737534831725991978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
--
Regards,
Savageduck
----------------7737534831725991978--
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|
')){kind=link}