On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:37:35 -0600, n@@dles wrote:
>mrbill@invalid.lss (mr.bill) wrote in news:496c3571$0$31172$450c70f1
>@news.privacy.li:
>
>> n@@dles, another oversight on my part. I was checking your
>> latest csv against my finalized collection and discovered two
>> other images I had neglected to list on the reject list.
>>
>> Since un was my first series to be finalized, I simply discarded
>> non-matching images rather than save them for subsequent
>> examination. I have no handy copy of the files that match your
>> csv but I am posting my copies, which match CD, for you to
>> examine.
>>
>> Soory, I didn't get these to you at first.
>>
>> --
>> mr.bill
>
>Both of my copies have incorrect headers. Yours win again!!! :)
>
>Cheers
>n@@dles
>
This brings us into agreement for Ukrainian Nymphets for all the crc32s.
We differ only in filename for set 35 which is a non-issue really.
The!Checker will still find the collection 100%.
I'm currently re-analyzing my Lovely Nymphets in time with the
sargeant's posts. It is not too overwhelming to go at this pace.
Already I see some reissues from LS.
My thoughts at first were to rename images reissued as 'a' and 'b', but
that really complicates things, and neither copy carries the real name.
My current thinking is to create a separate folder for 'deprecated' LS
images and put all the old copies there. That way, serious collectors
could have all legitimate LS issued images without messing up the
viewing folder with duplicate images where the models's eyes are covered
with a logo for example, or the image is upside-down.
--
mr.bill
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.picture.ls-series/439', 'Re: Ping: n@@dles re: Ukrainian Nymphets, please read zero - "un-57-079.jpg" yEnc (0/1)')){kind=link}