Charles F Frost <charles@f.frost> wrote:
>In article <548811c4.358225687@news-beta.easynews.com>, Grouse
><grouse1@gDONTSPAMITmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, she's a pip. Have a few of those spam-source sets,
>> but most are not worth keeping, the extended runs of closeups
>> and the models clearly not having any fun. Stopped checking
>> them years ago.
>
>Yeah, not much to be gleaned there (and that's the only set of Reena
>that I know of), but I'm wasting some time going through that crap
>once more mainly because I want to make sure that I have everything
>from that low-grade source of Galitsin's Liza, since I never saw or
>collected the originals. There, too, these sets aren't so good because
>of the crummy lighting (sometimes deliberately so, pretentiously artsy)
>and the many wasted shots, but... a face to die for.
>
>Another find was a few early sets of skinny-but-cute Monika Matejovska,
>a.k.a. 80K's Sharon 59, with reasonable photography, and with her grin
>lighting up the room. There's one who *was* having fun.
>
>But I have to try not to pay any attention to the idiotic subject
>lines. I was engrossed looking at the nude photos of the Olivia!
>You like to look it? So look! They are very young to be such
>attractive? Typically when you see a chick in glasses you might not
>look twice.
>
>--
>without shame and conscience!:)
>
>(story of my life)
Beware the pervers feet!
Grouse
--
Most women have long hair because they think it
distracts from their flaws. Short hair means
either that she's confident, which is always sexy,
or sometimes, it means that she simply does not
have any flaws.
"Long on hair, short on brains."
-- old French proverb
|
|
 (yEnc)')){kind=link}