On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:22:06 -0400, cc@cereal.net wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:04:58 -0400, Spermy Tonsilgloss
snip!
>>Gotta say that Christina looked really great with that baby fat in the
>>tits area!
>>
>>Sadly, she was still not showing much at all at that time, which I
>>think is her peak attractiveness. And then there was the "dancing"...
>>oh well... gotta accept bad with the good.
>>
>>Spermy
>><O=~~~~~~~
>
>i never understood any of the dancing criticism i mean what do ya
>want, dancing with the stars? just put those puppies in motion, works
>for me.
Well, in my opinion the flat footed, feet planted, side to side
rocking could be enhanced to more grinding and thrusting! She did pick
up more of that later. The versions we got earlier were boring,
lackluster, and repetitive... all I could do is wish it to stop. It
made her look mindless and less than graceful. Jiggling and jumping
should have been part of the routine as I totally agree that those
puppies in motion would have been the thing!
And ewww... "Dancing with the Stars" ? ...hope not, I'm not into
twirly and whirly theatrics, except maybe with tassles! Oh... darn,
come to think oif it, she could have used pasties and tassles in some
of her early work to conceal her "modesty". More puppy motion/action.
Okay let's also put her in a thong, and show way more ass to the
camera twerking and the like, too, as I felt that one neglected
"ass"pect was her rump.
I guess she was trying to be more the "model" vs. an adult
entertainer. AND, let's face it, did any one care about the "outfits"?
BUT I was/am/will be her fan for her physical attributes and
non-dancing talents! <wink>
Just my 2 cents!
Spermy
<O=~~~~~~~
|
|