Special_Ed@no.com wrote in
news:k2nddahaiejsq4qav0avj4q265i69fqp6f@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 09:33:59 GMT, dirtyold@bastard.com wrote:
>
>>Should not be any need for these, if she valued her clients she would
>>have posted real ones.
>>
>>Also really bad business not to do so.
>
> I have never known a woman who thinks she is hot when she is very
> pregnant. In fact, most guys do not think they do either (I happen to
> think they do, apparently you do, true, but we are not the majority in
> the world), and if that weren't the case, if most men thought preggos
> were hot, women wouldn't think they look bad pregnant. Therefore,
> given that our appreciation of that look is somewhat of a "niche", I
> don't think she can be blamed for not wanting to make those pictures
> and I don't think it is proof of lack of value of her clients any more
> than your demand for said pics is a lack of valuing her and her
> wishes.
>
> sEd
>
With all due respect, if you are a Christina fan from the beginning, there
is no way you WOULDN'T want to see her pregnant and nude! Think about those
patrons, some of who have posted their fantasy photos of her in that exact
state. IMO, it's a more than valid argument.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.nospam.christinamodel/476', 'Re: - "s834-094_sam.jpg" Another Pregger Fake for the slow times')){kind=link}