I probably should have said IF she starts a new site, but her
"current" site and her Twitter posts both say she's got a new one
coming soon. It will have to be either cast out material or preggo
pics for now. The preggo stuff will get a niche crowd if she goes that
route, but once the baby is born, we'll see how well she can juggle a
porn career and raising a newborn - not to mention losing the baby
fat.
On Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:59:56 -0500, Flatlander <flatlander47@cox.net>
wrote:
>You think there's actually going to be a new site? I expect the
>issue is that the current site isn't generating a lot of revenue
>anymore. Hard to tell what the webmaster is getting for material. It
>may be a lot of sets that aren't any good. After a lot of activity,
>she's disappeared from Twitter again. It takes two to argue. I'm
>sure there are issues on both sides.
>
>Still, we can be hopeful things will continue on and content will
>improve.
>
>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:52:35 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>
>>Makes sense. I can't see her shooting something genuinely new for a
>>site that's closing down in two weeks. I just hope she starts her new
>>site with fresh material.
>>
>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 20:51:04 -0400, cc@cereal.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:50:44 -0400, rebar <rebar@rbar.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>As expected, her "New Set" looks to be about 1 to 2 years old.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the upload though, Iam
>>>
>>>Could be. Didn't the web "master" say there were some leftover
>>>photosets (assuming they were shot a while back but initially
>>>rejected)?
|
|