Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural:4010
Path: news.nzbot.com!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer04.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx40.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Danny <notREALLY@buffoon.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.nospam.breasts.natural
Subject: Re: Do nipple piercings disqualify as "breasts natural"? Asking for a friend ;-)
Message-ID: <p9uneetg7fs836tqch4gj85mcfr3svfn2l@4ax.com>
References: <part1of1.1.ibLP8OHXA4TF5Q@ue.ph>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 16
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 08:07:03 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1612
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4023093534
I think "breasts natural" refers to "not augmented" wherein the
breasts themselves have not been modified internally with implants
that change the shape and/or size of the breasts.
Piercings do not change the size or shape and are therefore simply
ornamental.
So no, I don't think piercings disqualify.
Personally I find peircings rather sexy and appealing. I find tattoes
applied directly on the breasts or around them less appealing to the
point of distracting. But that's just my personal taste. In general.
I find small tats more attaractive than larger ones and plain designs
and symbols much more attractive than pictures, especially those
depicting the darker side of human expression.
|
|