On Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:15:59 +0100, ruby <ruby@tuesday.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 08:50:11 -0400, Yesomite Sam
><YesomiteSam@YellowSnow.nws> wrote:
>
>>I'm on XP cause I prefer the "Old fashioned" softies.
>>Though, I'm well installed.
>>
>>Being so, I wonder if there could be new softies that manage those
>>posts properly ?
>>It gives me a doubled window within the same viewer, any viewer.
>>That is not to say that I cannot view the clip anyhow...
>>Since "3D-PornExplorer" has to a certain extent ; the behavior of a
>>spammer, I guess that no-one can expect any help from that poster.
>>
>>In one case, the downloaded clip was that good that I decided to
>>recapture it, from only one side of the window within the viewer.
>>Obviously, I came up with a clip of Video: MPEG4 Video 682x576, 25fps
>>1020kbps. & audio being AAC 44100Hz stereo 127kbps.
>>I don't see the any reason to change its ratio even though I have the
>>software to do it. I'll post it "As is a little later.
>>
>>If anybody know of a sofware to view 3D-PornExplorer posts, please let
>>it know.
>>
>>Yes Sam.
>
>These aren't proper 3D films - none of the sites they come from -
>Lesbea, Sweetheart Video or the Wow family produce 3D films for
>download. These people have taken 2D films and applied some software
>to make them look like 3D - but there really is little 3D effect in
>them. So you're right - it is basically spam.
>
>I'll be posting all of the Lesbea clips in their original state over
>the coming months, I've probably spotted all the Wow ones and the
>original Sweetheart films have either been posted here or spotted from
>here.
>
>I'm going to post a real 3D clip - "OculusRealPorn.com - Lesbian
>Jacuzzi - Head tracking - 99DHdDNbm9" later today. You can see the
>difference even in 2D. I ought to thank Greetje27 for the clip as it
>comes from a site-rip he did recently.
>
>Ruby
__________________________
Exactly what I though Ruby.
At 1st sight, I though that 3D-PornExplorer would come-up with some
sort the advertisement of a 3D softy but we know that this isn't the
case.
Though, within 3D-PornExplorer posts, there are pretty "Interesting"
clips. Clip non-posted by other.
That is why I recaptured a few 3D-PornExplorer supposed 3D.
In now days, I only pick-up the "Cream of la creme".
As the sweet clit exposure 121024-a+l-lip2
BTW : Where's #1 ?
That is why I recaptured a few 3D-PornExplorer supposed 3D.
Whithin the capture I made, I obviously cut the format in half.
From a 16/9 wide screen display aspect ratio string, I stumbled on a
somewhat NTSC format of 4:3.
Later tried to re-encode in a 16/9 ratio wide screen but all my
softwares refused to process it.
Only the "Old fashioned" X-Vid free screen ratio accepted to process
it. But the blurr was unaceptable.
I though of cutting the height of the cip but calculating it, I
realized that the shots down there or up there driving the interest of
girls would disapear.
In the end, I only took care to get rid of the black side-bars to get
a full screen in any format as one use a proper viewer such as the
free "Media Player Classic - Home Cinema".
To sum it up, having to D/L a clip B-Cose of screens are absents is a
long task. i wouldn't even mind if the screen capts would be "Doubled"
views. At least, I'd know which ones are worthed for re-encoding.
Yes Sam.
__________________________
|
|