On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:53:05 -0800, Happy Clam <happyclam@shit.org>
wrote:
>On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 14:27:45 -0500, Wink Wink Nudge Nudge
><Wink@Nudgenot.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:12:28 -0400, cal <cal@calanon.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:42:49 -0700, Happy Clam <happyclam@shit.org>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Why do all YoYo Posts look like clips from Professional vids?
>>>>I mean JHO and Wink Nudge look amateur. But YoYo looks likes stuff
>>>>you'd find on a.b.e.
>>>>
>>>>Come on YoYo post some REAL amateur stuff
>>>
>>>
>>>Clam -
>>>Here's a new technique that'll save you a lot of time.
>>>If you're in a library and see books by a certain author, whose books
>>>you know you don't like, just don't check them out and read them.
>>>Voila!
>>>
>>>Can you dig it?
>>
>>Must torch everything I don't like. Must torch everything I don't
>>like. I must torch everything. I am part of everything. Must torch
>>myself.......
>>
>>WwNn
>
>Nobody answered my question! Why does his posts look like cuts from
>professional porn vids when this is an AMATEUR group!
Well, he posts what he finds as I do in other groups. He posts what
he desires and the group, with maybe some exceptions, enjoys his
efforts. Rather than target those who do share, perhaps you could
participate with whatever you might have to share. Usenet groups,
with exceptions, survives based on user submissions. Many groups have
simply died because nobody posts.
Usenet was once a vibrant community as this group still is. Trolls
who critize posters are a waste of effort. The nearly universal
response to your post demonstrates group viability. In older times
some would hunt trolls down directly and/or flame them horribly. We
are now too old to bother.
Nobody will force you to ignore posters you don't enjoy. Most of us
do use filters as needed.
--
Delete xx in address.
Mail to: harryh89@yahoo.comxx
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
|