'YoYo' <abmea_YoYo@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:k83vqatj1tcsfuq3tr2bqridscfggfgm33@4ax.com:
> I'm not sure, but have I missed your posts? If you have anything to
> share, I'm sure the group would appreciate it.
>
> Nobody seems to mind what we have described in the past as "semi-pro"
> material. I'm sure if anyone disapproved that they would have
> mentioned it. There was a discussion here a couple of years ago and
> the consensus was to go for it. I have almost two years of material
> ready to post -- that is if I post only one clip every day.
>
> If the group now thinks, as a whole, that semi-pro material is
> inappropriate here, I'd be glad to stop.
>
> Meanwhile, I'd love to see what you have to contribute.
>
> YoYo
>
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:23:25 GMT, eau <sweet@bye.bye> wrote:
>
>>harryh89@yahoo.comx (yEnc-Harry) wrote in
>>news:mombk907cg@news7.newsguy.com:
>>
>>> Not gonzo stuff.
>>
>>Uh, you've re-defined gonzo?
>>
>>Not amateur either.
>>
>>http://www.indecentes-voisines.com/videos/
>>
>>Professional amateurs, all 383 pages of 'em.
>>
>>Just give them your credit card number and a valid e-mail address and
>>collect the whole set! Allopass will bill you discretely.
>>
>>Ditto http://www.bitchstop.com/ .
>>Ditto http://www.brokeamateurs.com/ .
>>
>>and dozens more.
>>
>>Gimmeafreakinbreak.
>
actuaally I like KindaShy's definition "pro am"
|
|