On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:16:46 GMT, Sgt.Pepper@StrawberryFields.Forever wrote,
>----- poppycock@sApcg9v321QDAP4VP_3TMH18KI8 ----- 2007.12.01 - 20:07:40GMT
>-----
>
>Thanks for 22,23, apart from the missing pic from 24 I need set 21, your
>insert above says verified but by my csv none of this set are correct and I
>am at a loss to know why, all the rest seem to agree with both yours and my
>csv.
>
>Poppycock
>
<snip>
>
>----- poppycock@sApcg9v321QDAP4VP_3TMH18KI8 ----- 2007.12.02 - 12:37:48GMT
>-----
>
>On further investigation this set needs only single byte correction to
>resolve.
>
>Poppycock
>=============================================================================
So these guys knew about the spurious linefeed character nearly a year ago. I
may have to mark the Stunning Dolls csv discrepancy as unresolvable without
further information. Mine and bourne's differ by essentially one image. Of
course both must be included. Now I know why n@@dles shied from this set even
though he was aware of the extra byte issue and how to solve it.
--
mr.bill
|
|