wish I could help you out with some of the fills...especially #86
.......flash
tluv:
> In article <48f2e571$0$31794$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>,
> Ruby Tuesday <once@theWall> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:52:19 -0700, tluv@the.end wrote,
>>
>> >In article <lLSdnR_OGPNMVG_VnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@gonamic.de>,
>> > once@theWall (Ruby Tuesday) wrote:
>> >
>> >> =ybegin part=1 line=128 size=118440 name=na-100-01.jpg
>> >> =ypart begin=1 end=118440
>> >
>> >I'm having a hard time believing that's a 7yo.
>>
>> Opps! Didn't get all the subject line altered. The index says she's
10.
>
> No biggie! I'm remembering some of the LSM sets that claimed some of
the
> girls were 11-12yo, when they were clearly older than that, so I
assumed
> this was more of the same :) But I *can* believe she's 10.
|
|
 01 file - "na-100-01.jpg" yEnc')){kind=link}