On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:14:29 -0600, mrbill@invalid.ls (mr.bill) wrote:
>Fallen-Angels / Fallen-Girls readme
>===================================
>
>Much of the difference between the csv's of Count Draculol and
>n@@dles is easily explained by the renaming of sets to match set
>numbering.
>
>Examples: Sets 06a & 06b both contained files named fa-06a.
> Sets 07a & 07b contained files named fa-03a & fa-03b
> respectively.
> Sets 26a & 26b both contained files named fa-26b.
>
>CD changed his filenames; n@@dles kept the website names intact.
>Judicious renaming can get you sets to match both.
While I usually prefer to keep site numbering intact,
in this particular case I strongly prefer renumbering
as the odd set numbering is likely to confuse future
collectors. (Consider the LS-Barbie mess!)
>Another source of conflict is the inclusion of homemade,
>rotated files in CD's csv. All these are enclosed.
Not part of the site, but they do make a nice addition
(and viewing them is easier than turning my monitor on
its side!)
>The last source of differences stems from the reissue of
>a few pics to move the logo off the model's face. I am
>enclosing file pairs from sets 39a & 39b.
Thanks. I've examined those, and am not quite sure why
the site even bothered.
>I lack images of fa-42a-24.jpg, fa-42a-40.jpg, & fa-43a-34.jpg
>that match CD. I do have ones to match n@@dles if you need
>them, but since they were included in the Godfather post I'm
>assuming you don't need them either.
It would appear that I did not save GF's posts. However,
I will likely need other fills to match n@@dles so it may
be best to wait until I have a miss_wrong.
>If you have copies of the last 3 pics to match CD, could you
>please post them? I have included sfv's for the 2 sets (42a
>& 43a) to assist in the search. Just dropping them into the
>appropriate folder and double-clicking them works if you have
>an sfv association ticked in QuickPar.
On their way...
--
ots
|
|