On 24 Dec 2008 19:09:11 GMT, EAX wrote:
>mrbill@invalid.ls (mr.bill) wrote:
>
>> You'll want to keep your un- version of the file as a
>> (r)epaired / (r)estored / (r)eplacement image. I'm including
>> a copy of both for you.
>
>I've compared two files. The first 70 kilobytes and the last 2 of both of
them
>are identical. The size is the
>same. Why do not replace corrupted lod- picture with non-corrupted version of
>un- permanently in Old
>Story csv? Even if there was corrupted version on the site. In this rare case
>we have identical
>replacement and should take advantage of it.
I'd love to be able to retroactively patch up all of LS' mistakes. We can't.
And trying to do so adds one more layer of confusion for the next group of
downloaders to unravel.
I love that an exact replacement is available and I keep it in my Old Story
set, just renamed, that's all.
|
|
![Favorite](javascript:myfavor('http://www.nzbot.com/article/alt.binaries.ls/124', 'Re: <EAX> - read zero - "lod-074-064.jpg" yEnc (0/1)')){kind=link}