On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 11:04:10 -0500, Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu>
wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 15:40:50 GMT, "dr. who?" <noemail@none.com> wrote:
>
>>Cream-Ya <cum-one@cum-all.edu> wrote in
>>news:aidds9hncfvt0035k267hcsa5i20f7lvtn@4ax.com:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you think the tweak-news spammers have any idea how easy it is to
>>> filter their posts ?
>>>
>>> Nah, prolly not. Spammers not too bright ! B^]]
>>>
>>> Anybody know how they recruit these dweebs ?
>>> Trying to generate traffic to sites for pay ?
>>>
>>> Jes wunnerin'
>>
>>it's not how smart or dumb they are, it is the idiots that support them
>>that they count on.
>
>
>As usenet has been phased out of many ISPs and most 'users'
>have gone to premium servers, one has to wonder how many
>newbies these spams entice to sign up for www access.
>
>Is it the purveyors themselves, or the affiliates who generate these
>spams in the hopes of generating paying customers ?
One thought...such as it is...lol
When I first signed up for my usenet provider I was NOT allowed to
post ANYTHING. I could download what I pleased but I had to wait 3
months before I was allowed to even REPLY to a poster with a "thanks".
Am wondering how many usenet providers do the same?
Jes wunnerin' also...
|
|