On 2016-02-03 02:44:09 +0000, Old Geek said:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:59:23 -0600, ksstargazer <noone@nowhere.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Old Geek <eldergeekenator@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:0q4tab5e7dhhmn4d2e2oeong5cm5rh8nb0@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 15:32:43 -0500, R. Daneel Olivaw
>>> <olivawasimov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:04:01 -0600, Old Geek
>>>> <eldergeekenator@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> M.P. Android posted number 2 on 1/29/09 as Young Womans Fantasies.
>>>>
>>>> That appears to be the same as "Teen Fantasies 1" posted here
>>>> recently.
>>>
>>> No, it isn't Young Womans Fantasies is 3,999,628,748 bytes and runs
>>> for 1:10:51. Teen Fantasies is 3,050,016,985 bytes and runs for 51:52.
>>> I'll post some samples as well.
>>
>> Actually this is the same as Teenage Fantasies 2 aka Young Girls Fantasies,
>> Young Woman's Fantasies.
>
> Yes it is. That was my point from the start.
>
> EG.
Ok, I'm going to add my comment to this with no guarantees that I'm
correct, but I have a movie named Teenage Fantasies - Part II that,
while it looks very similiar, is not the same movie. It is a) really
poor quality and b) a very similiar theme with a young Rene Bond giving
some guy a blowjob between other sex scenes, but the full brown wall
that is behind her in this movie is only about half as high and there
is a plant on her right. It is also only 36 minutes long and I have no
idea where I got it.
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|