Path: news.nzbot.com!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 04:41:38 -0500
From: sitkaman@nospam.com (sitkaman)
Sender: sitkaman@nospam.com
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics
Subject: Repost of a.b.d.e.c. post #292 Dracula Sucks Vaga nfo.txt posted by Cloud Chaser on Nov 30, 2004 (1/1)
X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST www.CosmicWolf.com)
Message-ID: <WJ-dnRS0ZrfP_KbInZ2dnUVZ5u0AAAAA@giganews.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 04:41:38 -0500
Lines: 19
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-7lRyZMPhPyLLpiwrb3SOyHYWCvxdSI4c6TL6hWYAhJ7gKui04VpJBq0BsFJrmFpHuYwHQwNrO1FBSdr!RL/ph2Yf1Ju3ao02rLeRP4g+uW/PcAwhskMrecoOikNP3Rkw5foQDjrUwF2RSgJffT8lHVk=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3019
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3943323659
X-Received-Bytes: 3303
Xref: news.nzbot.com alt.binaries.dvd.erotica.classics:1517
Dracula Sucks Vaga nfo.txt
After watching and comparing the two versions of Dracula Sucks (aka Lust at
First Bite) included in this 2-disc Vinegar Syndrome re-issue, I realized that
my nfo for disc 1 was not entirely accurate, and I wanted to correct the
misstatements.
The nfo says:
"Disc 1 includes the 94-minute hardcore 'director's cut', which includes most but
not all of the hardcore footage, and is possibly the only available hard version
that also includes all of the blood, death and urination."
In fact, the director's cut has far less hardcore footage than Lust at First Bite.
There is some penetration visible, but the sex scenes are considerably shorter,
and there are no visible cum shots. A few sex scenes are missing entirely.
While the urination is visible in the "flash forward" when Dracula (Gillis) first meets
Lucy (Serena) -- and we see a reverse/negative image of the later bathroom sex scene,
and big red flames superimposed -- the peeing is missing in this version when the sex
scene actually takes place. We see the evidence via Serena's wet dress and chest, but
whatever made her wet (i.e. pee) is not shown.
It's interesting that the director's cut shows all the shots of Dracula and his fellow
vampires biting the necks, tits and other body parts of their victims (plus the bloody
aftermath) but shows none of the cumshots during sex scenes. Whereas the alternate Lust at
First Bite version shows none of the biting (and relatively little blood) but does show
the cumshots and considerably more sex footage.
One major advantage that the director's cut has, is that the storyline is arranged in a more
logical order, and the plot is much easier to follow. The alternate Lust at First Bite
version is edited poorly and somewhat disjointed, and rather difficult to follow.
Vaga
|
|