On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:07:21 -0800, Herb <Herb@the.herb.garden> wrote:
>Well, since you asked.
>
>What "oesd post" post are you talking about? You neither posted THIS
>message as a reply to connect it nor did you put anything in either
>the subject line or the body of the message to connect it to any
>previous post.
>
>So I'll assume it refers to the post labeled A2280
>
>First, what do YOU think? Can you see the post in your newsreader?
>What does it look like? Does it look "ok" to you?
>
>It's a relatively small post - a single 175KB rar file with a single
>design that's broken up into 73 miniscule parts of about 3K each. And
>even Agent can't combine them automatically.
>
My Agent has no problem what so ever, see attachment. and i like it 73 headers for
a 175 KB post. Parts should be 1K then it even becomes more interesting.
>
>So what's wrong? Mainly your Agent settings.
>
>First you have it broken up into parts that are 3000 bytes instead of
>300000. Then, you don't have the box checked that says to add the file
>name into the subject line - that's why Agent can't combine the parts.
>
>Attached is a sample of what your Attachment/Properties settings
>should look like.
>
>As a minor note, I think that using yEnc for anything this small is
>unnecessary and somewhat counter-productive because of the number of
>people using Outlook Express or Mozilla/Thunderbird as their primary
>news reader.
>
>Does that answer your question?
>
>As I wrote this, I see another post from you coming through (subject
>line: "the right oesd ..."
>
>That one has the size ok, but still doesn't have the file name checked
>- OTOH, it has two attachments, and I'm not sure what Agent does with
>the file name(s) in that case. I think that it's easier for people if
>either the two rar's were posted as separate messages or if the two
>FOLDERS were included in a single rar. But that may just be me.
>
>- Herb
|
|