On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:23:03 +1000, hopper
>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>>On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 07:56:32 +1000, hopper
>>
>>>Pixie <Pixie@AnnWheatley.com.invalid>wrote:
>
>/snip
>
>>>Also... remember.. digitisers "do it" because they want
>>>to.
>>>
>>/snicker...
>>Oh!! Heard that somewhere's, didja...??
>>
><q>
>Give a man a fish and you have a friend for an hour.
>Give a man a fishing rod and you have a friend for
>Life.
></q>
>
>That one?
>
/watches paper aeroplane zoom by for a second flyover
/grin
>Crikey how did I survive past weaning without me
>Mum..hunting me up!
>
The wolves raised you... I have proof... ROFL
>/snip
>>>I reckon even Kofi Annan, as another retired "old
>>>coot", wouldn't want the job<g>
>>>
>>Yes! A delicate balance of back scratching...
>>Kofi Annan??... Twas His birthday last week..
>>
>The same.. and yes, I SMS'd him.. you>
>
No texting here.
Never learnt. Doan wanna learn.
Mobile phone won't even show pics and I rarely even answer the
ringtone.
And TWITter... doan even start me... /grin
>>Apols to budding digitisers out there...
>>I was only addressing the two with the most press (at the moment).
>>The loudest and the not so loud one..../grin
>>
>/scuffs toe in 6.5pH dirt
>
What makes 6.5pH so special?
/Dogpile....
The optimum pH for apples... /grin
Pity 'bout that up there!
>wellll... I do only handle stage lighting, ya noe.
>
And ya do it so well... /shields eyes...
>I could bang a drum or sumthin' if that helps.. yer
>hearing??
> [wizard grin]
>
Bang a drum eh.... that I gotta see... rofl
>>How did that Brother design get sewed out using a Singer??
>>Brother says that is not possible..... ROFL
>> :-^
>>
>Dunno.. you tell me.
>I haint no "copyright X-Spurt".
>/hands in air
>
Musta found it lying around in here.... /shock, horror...
/grin
>>2006/7 was a tragic year for flame wars...
>>
>"tragic" because it was run(fed) by morons
>or
>"tragic" cos the morons lost? :-/
>
The moron factor.
Yeah, the morons eventually lost.
But, they can't change what they won't acknowledge (courtesy Dr Phil)
and they lived on...
>>something few wish to revisit.
>>
>oH I dunno abowd that... nothing like a bit of
>'nose-bleed' to separate the wimmins from the
>men<bfg>
>
You would break his face I reckons. His nose wouldun be all that was
bleedin'... /grin
>>Now it should just be about constructive learning.
>>School was never this sensitive to criticism!
>>
>.. agreed.. and yes to working a way forward to more
>independence for those so dependant here (ABCP)..
>
We can but try.
>>>The problem then is what does one "rebuild" in an image
>>>and still meet the expectations of the requestor?
>>>One has to run through a "is this what you want to see"
>>>type scenario.
>>>With the limited feedback so far experienced -- using
>>>that method -- only frustration and wasted time has
>>>been the result. For both parties no doubt.
>>>
>>Hmmm. A situation that won't improve until everyone understands the
>>basic rules of digitising.
>>
>I say it wont improve until people quit with reading
>their own press.
>Like,, "Is <Blah.pes> out there?"... and that is the
>only thread read.. ever :-/
>
Well yeah... but it takes a village...
>I have just built a response for one such dude/dudette
>
I see'd...
>>Yeah, you start with a graphic, but if one is going to persist with
>>programs that need a perfect graphic.... there will be tears.
>>
>A defined graphic gets half (sometimes more) the
>immediate structural work done...
>
For those without an artistic streak in them... yeah...
Yer point?... /grin
/cracks petite knuckles... one by one... >:-)
>and eliminates any
>guessing the digitiser is often asked (subliminally) to
>do.
>
Any guessing the digitiser has to do is the problem of said digitiser!
Nuffin' to do with the graphic...
>>A good program will allow changes to be done by hand - moving stitch
>>points if the auto biz got it wrong.
>>
>agreed.. BUT.. a defined graphic can be used to _minimise_ that work.
>
Sounds like photo realistic work is gonna be a long way off.... /grin
>>In saying that... I just saw Snickle's request..... ROFL
>>
>Yeh.. well that woman is a fskn lost cause and a plain
>outright thief of time to boot.
>Has been since Day 01 back in August 2004 :-]
>
This!! this is priceless...
Special day was it??.... rofl
>/snip
>
>>>
>>Yeah, I have a date with some music and a dance floor.
>>
>On a Tuesday..!!!
>Heavy demand .. huh??
>
One inch... just one inch...
>>>cYa
>>>
>>Figuritively speaking, yessums.
>>
>Well a bit hard to get me head into Skype.
>I am told I will have to wait until the wide screen
>technology overcomes the 600mm (2ft) barrier.
>
Some bandwidth usage on that day... Lights will go out all over town.
/laff
>Now IF it was my tight buns you were peeking at.. no
>problemeo...!
> /LMAO
>
Tight buns eh...??
I wanna believe it... I do. I do... I know ya wouldun lie about
something as important as that...
But that elf pic is pure fantasy on your behalf.... ROFL
>
>cheerio
Nighty night.
Pixie :-))
|
| Follow-ups: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
|